Finance ministers of the European Union decided on Tuesday morning to delay two key votes on an internationally-backed tax deal and a new package of financial aid for Ukraine due to an unresolved dispute over Hungary’s cohesion funds.
Hungary is on the verge of having €7.5 billion of its allocated share of the EU budgets frozen after failing to complete a series of reforms that are meant to address, among other issues, corruption, irregularities in public procurement and conflicts of interest from government officials.
The unprecedented freezing of EU funds was recommended last week by the European Commission under a novel conditionality mechanism, designed to safeguard the bloc’s financial interests.
The European Commission’s recommendation was then passed on to finance ministers, who have the final say. But the decision added on top of a long to-do list, leading to several files becoming politically interlinked.
Tuesday’s busy agenda included votes on:
- An OECD-brokered deal to establish a 15% minimum tax on multinational corporations.
- An €18-billion package of financial aid to help Ukraine cover its budgetary deficit across 2023.
- The freezing of €7.5 billion in EU cohesion funds earmarked for Hungary.
- The approval of Hungary’s COVID-19 recovery fund, worth €5.8 billion in grants.
The tax deal has been under discussion since mid-2021 as it needs to be transposed into EU law in order to become effective. Hungary was the only country that opposed the deal when it was put to a vote in June, arguing the reform would hurt European competitiveness and endanger jobs.
More recently, Hungary voiced its displeasure regarding the €18-billion package of financial aid for Ukraine, which would be bankrolled through the issuance of new common EU debt.
Brussels is keen to approve the 2023 envelope as soon as possible after a much-publicised failure to release the entire €9 billion that was promised to Kyiv earlier this year.
As these two files – the tax deal and the financial aid – require unanimity to be passed, Hungary has been able to leverage its veto power to exert pressure on the two other decisions concerning its public coffers – the €7.5 billion in cohesion funds and the €5.8 billion in recovery grants – which only need a qualified majority.
Crucially, the recovery plan has to be approved before the end of the year, otherwise, Hungary would lose 70% of the pre-allocated cash.
In the end, the four votes became interlinked, despite their distinct nature.
“I would like to point out that I see all these topics as one package,” Czech Finance Minister Zbyněk Stanjura said on Tuesday morning, before heading to the ministerial meeting.
The Czech Republic currently holds the rotating presidency of the EU Council and is tasked with setting the agenda and steering the political debate.
The question of whether ministers would take a vote on the four key issues had been the centre of speculation in Brussels for the last few days, with diplomats saying that it would all depend on the mood inside the room.
After an exchange of views over breakfast, ministers decided on Tuesday morning to postpone the key votes, a Czech spokesperson said.
“Hungary is not in favour of the amendment of the financial regulation,” said Hungarian Minister Mihály Varga during the public debate about Ukraine’s financial aid.
“We will not be discouraged. Our ambition remains that we will start the disbursement of our aid to Ukraine in early January,” Zbyněk Stanjura replied, asking the Council’s team to examine “alternative” solutions that can bypass the unanimity requirement.
“We will be looking for a solution supported by 26 member states.”
It is unclear when the four files could be voted on, as no further meetings of finance ministers are scheduled to take place before the end of the year.
The Czech Republic, however, could convene an emergency meeting to move forward with the stalled files.
Source link here